April 12, 2025

袭明社区论坛

Ray Dalio:一生一次的时刻在来...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Ray Dalio:一生一次的时刻在来临!不要误以为当下发生的事情只是关税

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
张大军
(@26791pwpadmin)
Member Admin
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 62
Topic starter  

当前,市场对新一轮关税的宣布及其对经济和市场的重大影响给予了高度关注,这是完全合理的。但与此同时,人们几乎没有注意到导致这些措施出台的根本原因——以及未来可能到来的更大规模的冲击。别误会,这些关税确实是重要的事件,但多数人忽略了正在推动一切(包括关税本身)的更深层次力量。

在我最新的文章(本文)中,我讨论了一个我认为更值得高度关注的问题:

我们正在经历一场典型的全球货币、政治与地缘秩序的系统性瓦解。这类瓦解每一代人只会遇到一次,但在历史上,它在类似不可持续的条件下曾多次上演。

此时此刻,人们理所应当地将大量注意力集中在新宣布的关税及其对市场和经济的巨大影响上,但对促使这些措施出台的深层背景、以及可能即将到来的更大规模冲击,却几乎无人关注。

不要误会,这些关税公告确实是重大事件,而我们都知道特朗普总统是促成它们的直接推手,但大多数人忽视了那些让他当选总统、以及最终推动关税出台的深层背景。

同时,人们也大多忽略了那些正在驱动几乎一切(包括关税)的更为深远的力量。

我认为,更重要、也更需要我们时刻记住的是:我们正在见证的是全球主要的货币秩序、政治秩序和地缘政治秩序的典型崩解。这类崩解,一生中只会遇到一次,但历史上在存在类似不可持续条件的时期已发生过多次。

具体而言:

货币/经济秩序正在崩溃,原因在于现有债务规模过大,新增债务速度过快,而资本市场与经济体系又严重依赖这一不可持续的债务结构。

这一结构之所以无法持续,是因为存在严重失衡:一方面是债务方(如美国)债务过多,继续过度借贷以维持过度消费;另一方面是债权方(如中国)持有的债务已过多,却仍依赖向债务方出口商品来维持自身经济增长。这种失衡正在承受巨大的修正压力,而修正过程势必将从根本上改变货币秩序。

例如,在一个去全球化的世界中,主要经济体彼此不再信任对方是否会继续提供关键商品(这是美国的担忧)或是否会按时偿还债务(这是中国的担忧),那么还存在着巨额贸易失衡与资本失衡的状态就显得极为荒谬。

这正是自给自足成为优先目标的战争式博弈的表现。

任何了解历史的人都知道,在类似背景下,这类风险反复演化成我们今天所看到的这些问题。

因此,过去那种中国等国家低成本制造、对美出口、购买美国债务,而美国借债消费、积累巨额债务的模式,将不可避免地被打破。

这种不可持续状态,还因为其导致了美国制造业的空心化而愈加严重——这不仅削弱了美国中产阶级的就业基础,还使美国不得不从一个它越来越视为“敌人”的国家进口关键物资。在去全球化时代,这种体现出贸易与资本高度联通的大失衡,必须通过某种方式收缩。

同样显而易见的是,美国政府的债务水平及其增长速度不可持续。

很明显,货币秩序将不得不以极具破坏性的方式发生改变,以削减这些失衡与过度,并且我们正处于这一变化过程的早期阶段。这将对资本市场与经济产生深远影响,我将在其他场合进一步展开讨论。

国内政治秩序也在崩解,源于教育水平、机会、生产力、收入与财富、价值观的巨大分裂,以及现有政治体系无法有效修复这一切。

当前的格局,是左翼与右翼民粹主义者之间以“赢者通吃”为目标的对抗,争夺掌控政权的权力。

这种局势正在导致民主制度的崩塌,而民主制度的运作依赖妥协与法治,而历史已经反复表明,这两者在当前这种背景下极易崩溃。

历史也显示,在经典民主与法治失效之后,强人型的威权领导人往往会崛起,填补权力真空。

毫无疑问,当前不稳定的政治形势将与本文提及的其他四股力量交织演化——例如,金融市场与经济的波动极可能引发进一步的政治与地缘动荡。

国际地缘政治秩序也在瓦解,过去由单一主导力量(美国)制定并维系的国际秩序正在终结。

由美国主导的多边、合作型全球体系,正被一种以力量为主导的单边主义体系所取代。在这一新格局下,美国依然是世界最强大的力量,但其策略已转向以“美国优先”为核心的单边主义。这正在通过贸易战、地缘博弈、科技对抗,乃至局部军事冲突等方式展现出来。

自然力量(如干旱、洪水、疫情)也越来越具破坏性,而技术革命(尤其是AI)正对生活的各个方面产生深远影响,包括货币/债务/经济体系、政治秩序、国际格局(通过改变国家之间的经济和军事互动方式),以及应对自然灾害的成本结构。

这些关键力量,以及它们之间的互动,才是真正值得我们关注的焦点。

因此,我强烈建议你不要被像“关税”这样抓眼球的戏剧性新闻所转移注意力。真正需要关注的,是这五股关键力量及其相互作用,因为它们才是“总周期(Overall Big Cycle)”变化的根本驱动。

如果你把注意力停留在这些表面新闻上,

就会错失对以下三件事的洞察:

(a)这些新闻事件背后的宏观条件与动态机制

(b)事件如何反向作用于那些更宏大的系统性力量

(c)总周期如何演进,以及每个阶段通常如何展开..

而这些正是判断未来走势的关键。

我还建议你特别关注这些相互作用之间的结构性联动...

例如,思考特朗普在关税上的行为会如何影响以下五个层面:

1.货币/市场/经济秩序(会造成破坏性影响)

2.国内政治秩序(很可能同样造成破坏,削弱他的支持基础)

3.国际地缘政治秩序(在金融、经济、政治、地缘方面将带来多方面破坏)

4.气候议题(一定程度上削弱全球有效应对气候变化的能力)

5.技术发展(对美国而言可能正负交织:一方面有利于将更多科技生产回流至国内,另一方面却可能扰乱依赖资本市场支持的科技投融资机制)

在进行这些思考时,有一点值得始终记住:当前正在发生的一切,其实是历史上类似情形的当代表达。

建议你研究以往政策制定者在类似局面下的应对方式,

由此建立一个政策工具清单:

包括暂停向“敌对国家”支付债务利息、实施资本管控、开征特别税种等。很多如今看似“不可想象”的政策,在历史上都曾被采纳,因此我们更应研究这些工具是如何发挥作用的。

货币、政治与地缘秩序的瓦解,通常会以经济大萧条、内战、世界大战等形式表现出来,并最终催生新的秩序。

这一循环在历史上反复发生,深刻理解它们,比什么都重要。


   
Quote
张大军
(@26791pwpadmin)
Member Admin
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 62
Topic starter  

Don't Make the Mistake of Thinking That What's Now Happening is Mostly About Tariffs

At this moment, a huge amount of attention is being justifiably paid to the announced tariffs and their very big impacts on markets and economies while very little attention is being paid to the circumstances that caused them and the biggest disruptions that are likely still ahead. Don't get me wrong, while these tariff announcements are very important developments and we all know that President Trump caused them, most people are losing sight of the underlying circumstances that got him elected president and brought these tariffs about. They are also mostly overlooking the vastly more important forces that are driving just about everything, including the tariffs.
 
The far bigger, far more important thing to keep in mind is that we are seeing a classic breakdown of the major monetary, political, and geopolitical orders. This sort of breakdown occurs only about once in a lifetime, but they have happened many times in history when similar unsustainable conditions were in place.
More specifically:
  1. The monetary/economic order is breaking down because there is too much existing debt, the rates of adding to it are too fast, and existing capital markets and economies are supported by this unsustainably large debt. The debt is unsustainable because the of the large imbalance between a) debtor-borrowers who owe too much debt and are taking on too much debt because they are hooked on debt to finance their excesses (e.g., the United States) and b) lender-creditors (like China) who already hold too much of the debt and are hooked on selling their goods to the borrower-debtors (like the United States) to sustain their economies. There are big pressures for these imbalances to be corrected one way or another and doing so will change the monetary order in major ways. For example, it is obviously incongruous to have both large trade imbalances and large capital imbalances in a deglobalizing world in which the major players can't trust that the other major players won't cut them off from the items they need (which is an American worry) or pay them the money they are owed (which is a Chinese worry). This is a result of these parties being in a type of war in which self-sufficiency is of paramount importance. Anyone who has studied history knows that such risks under such circumstances have repeatedly led to the same sorts of problems we're seeing now. So, the old monetary/economic order in which countries like China manufacture inexpensively, sell to Americans, and acquire American debt assets, and Americans borrow money from countries like China to make those purchases and build up huge debt liabilities will have to change. These obviously unsustainable circumstances are made even more so by the fact that they have led to American manufacturing deteriorating, which both hollows out middle class jobs in the U.S. and requires America to import needed items from a country that it is increasingly seeing as an enemy. In an era of deglobalization, these big trade and capital imbalances, which reflect trade and capital interconnectedness, will have to shrink one way or another. Also, it should be obvious that the U.S. government debt level and the rate at which the government debt is being added to is unsustainable. (You can find my analysis of this in my new book How Countries Go Broke: The Big Cycle.) Clearly, the monetary order will have to change in big disruptive ways to reduce all these imbalances and excesses, and we are in the early part of the process of it changing. There are huge capital market implications to this that have huge economic implications, which I will delve into at another time.
  2. The domestic political order is breaking down due to huge gaps in people's education levels, opportunity levels, productivity levels, income and wealth levels, and values—and because of the ineffectiveness of the existing political order to fix things. These conditions are manifest in win-at-all-cost fights between populists of the right and populists of the left over which side will have the power and control to run things. This is leading to democracies breaking down because democracies require compromise and adherence to the rule of law, and history has shown that both break down at times like those we are now in. History also shows that strong autocratic leaders emerge as classic democracy and classic rule of law are removed as barriers to autocratic leadership. Obviously, the current unstable political situation will be affected by the other four forces I’m referring to here—e.g., problems in the stock market and economy will likely create political and geopolitical problems.
  3. The international geopolitical world order is breaking down because the era of one dominant power (the U.S.) that dictates the order that other countries follow is over. The multilateral, cooperative world order the U.S. led is being replaced by a unilateral, power-rules approach. In this new order, the U.S. is still largest power in the world and is shifting to a unilateral, "America first" approach. We are now seeing that manifest in the U.S. led trade-war, geopolitical war, technology war, and, in some cases, military wars.
  4. Acts of nature (droughts, floods and pandemics) are increasingly disruptive, and
  5. Amazing changes in technology such as AI will be highly impactful to all aspects of life, including the money/debt/economic order, the political order, the international order (by affecting interactions between countries economically and militarily), and the costs of acts of nature.
Changes in these forces and how they are affecting each other is what we should be focusing on.
For that reason, I urge you to not to let news-grabbing dramatic changes like the tariffs draw your attention away from these five big forces and their interrelationships, which are the real drivers of Overall Big Cycles changes. If you allow yourself to be distracted by them, you will a) miss how the conditions and the dynamics of these big forces are causing these news-making changes, b) fail to think through how these news-making changes will affect these big forces, and c) fail to keep focused on how this Overall Big Cycle and the parts that drive it typically transpire, which will tell you a lot about what is likely to happen.
 
I also urge you to think about the interrelationships that are critically important. For example, think about how Donald Trump's actions on tariffs will affect 1) the monetary/market, economy order (it will be disruptive to it), 2) the domestic political order (it will likely be disruptive to it as it will probably undermine his support), 3) the international geopolitical order (it will be disruptive to it in many obvious ways that are financial, economic, political, and geopolitical) 4) climate (it will somewhat undermine the world’s ability to deal with the climate change issue effectively), and 5) technology development (it will be disruptive in some positive ways to the U.S., like bringing more technology production into the U.S., and in some harmful ways, like being disruptive to the capital markets that are needed to support technology development and in too many other ways to innumerate here.)
 
As you do this, it’s helpful to keep in mind that what is happening now is just a contemporary version of what has happened innumerable times throughout history. I urge you to study the actions that policy makers took in analogous past cases in which they found themselves in similar positions to help you build a list of things that they might do—things like suspending debt service payments to "enemy" countries, establishing capital controls to prevent the free flow of capital out of the country, and imposing special taxes. Many of these things would’ve been unimaginable not long ago, so we should also study how these policies work. The breakdowns in the monetary, political, and geopolitical orders that take the forms of depressions, civil wars, and world wars, that then lead to the new monetary, political orders that govern interactions within countries, and the geopolitical orders that govern interactions between countries until they break down, have all happened repeatedly and are the most important things to understand well. I described them in detail in my book Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order so you can see it clearly laid out there. The Overall Big Cycle is described in six clearly identifiable stages that unfold as one order becomes the next.  It is laid out in such detail that it is easy to compare what is now happening with what typically happens, so it is possible to identify what stage the cycle is in and what is likely to come next.
 
When I wrote that book and my other books, I hoped, as I still do, that I would be able 1) to help policy makers understand these forces and interact with them to produce better policies so we get better results, 2) to help individuals who can collectively but not individually affect policies to deal with these forces well so they could get better results for themselves and those they care about, and 3) to encourage smart people who have different views than mine to have open, thoughtful exchanges with me so that we can all try to get at what is true and what to do about it.

   
ReplyQuote
Share: